Format-Specification: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Name: ethos
Maintainer: Christian Hergert <chris@dronelabs.com>
Source: http://dronelabs.com/projects/
Disclaimer: Dual-licensing of contents under doc/ granted by Maintainer. See X-License-Rationale.

Files: *
Copyright: 2009, Christian Hergert <chris@dronelabs.com>
License: LGPL-2.1

Files: tests/manager-dep/jstest.test-plugin.disabled,
       tests/manager-dep/another.test-plugin.disabled,
       tests/manager-dep/sample.test-plugin.in,
       tests/manager-dep/example.test-plugin.in
Copyright: 2009, Public Domain


Files: tests/c-plugins/sample.test-plugin.in,
       examples/vala-host/plugins/sample2.valethos-plugin,
       examples/vala-host/plugins/sample.valethos-plugin,
       examples/sample/plugins/progress.sample-plugin,
       examples/sample/plugins/entry.sample-plugin,
       examples/sample/plugins/scroller.sample-plugin
Copyright: Public Domain

Files: po/de.po, po/fr.po
Copyright: 2009, Novopia Solutions Inc.
License: LGPL-2.1

Files: debian/*
Copyright: 2009, Christian Hergert <chris@dronelabs.com>
Copyright: 2009, Mathieu Trudel <mathieu.tl@gmail.com>
License: GPL-3

Files: doc/*
Copyright: 2009, Christian Hergert <chris@dronelabs.com>
License: GPL-2 or GFDL
X-License-Rationale:
 From: Christian Hergert <christian.hergert@gmail.com>
 To: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.tl@gmail.com>
 
 Sorry to get back to you so late, been super busy.
 
 I can dual license the text.
 
 -- Christian
 
 On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
 mathieu.tl@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 > Hi Christian,
 >
 > One more detail, since I'm taking a look at the files available and
 > more especially debian/copyright:
 >
 > The GFDL license under which the documentation materials under docs/
 > are distributed is incompatible with the DFSG [1], which is a
 > significant blocker for uploading to Debian.
 >
 > Is there any chance you could also grant distribution of the
 > documentation under a different license, such as the GPL?
 > Dual licensing is obviously acceptable, and GFDL/GPL dual-licensing
 > seems to be what is recommended in cases where licensing under the
 > GFDL is needed for compatibility [2].
 >
 > Regards,
 >
 > Mathieu Trudel
 > mathieu.tl@gmail.com
 >
 > [1] http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001
 > [2] http://people.debian.org/~bap/dfsg-faq.html<http://people.debian.org/%7Ebap/dfsg-faq.html>(Question #8 particularly)
 >
 ---
 From: Christian Hergert <christian.hergert@gmail.com>
 To: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.tl@gmail.com>
 
 GPL-2 is fine.
 -- Christian
 
 On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <
 mathieu.tl@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Christian Hergert
 > <christian.hergert@gmail.com> wrote:
 > > Sorry to get back to you so late, been super busy.
 > >
 > > I can dual license the text.
 > >
 >
 > Awesome. What would you prefer? GPL-2, 3?
 >
 > / Matt
 >

License: LGPL-2.1
 On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU Lesser General
 Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1'.

License: GPL-2
 On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
 Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2'.

License: GPL-3
 On Debian GNU/Linux systems, the complete text of the GNU General
 Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3'.
